Impact Investing: Toward Impact Consensus
A prevailing narrative has developed that impact investing offers investors pre-defined financial returns. This has many in the philanthropic community confused whether impact investing is about the needs of investors or the needs of the communities which their funding seeks to benefit. Indeed, the more recent debate has framed the discussion as one in which investors attain nothing less than market-rates of return for their impact investments. However, impact investing was originally conceived to improve the lives of others; that impact investing could also deliver financial returns to investors was a means to an end.
For decades, the financial instruments used to improve the lives of people living in poverty included making grants to nonprofit organizations, or possibly offering below-market-rate loans instead of grants to support low-income housing. The microfinance movement dramatically expanded access to credit for people living in poverty. Gradually, new financial instruments coupled with innovative business models could benefit marginalized communities.
Scaling Philanthropy: The Emergence of Creative Capital for Social Solutions
Author: Mark Crosswell
Over the past several years, many of us in the philanthropic community have watched and wondered about impact investing and what it means, if anything, for fueling social change. Whether you've read about it in blogs, witnessed panel discussions or actually put your toe in the water, for the longest time most of us have been confused on how a social good could come from an investment that also yields a financial return.
Along the way, I also noticed that Georgia and the Southeast were trailing other regions regarding the use of impact capital with philanthropy.
Apparently, I haven't been alone. In late 2016, I joined a group of other concerned Georgians who came together to tackle one question: How might we accelerate impact investing throughout Georgia?
We call ourselves the Georgia Social Impact Collaborative, or GSIC, and our goal is simply to educate stakeholders and provide onramps for investors to find ways to invest in social outcomes. Some of us are with foundations or nonprofits, some are private or angel investors and a few are involved with startups, social enterprise and funding social ventures. Yet all of us were truly perplexed on why impact investing in the Georgia and the South was not nearly as developed as in other parts of the country.
Take a look at the West Coast, where social innovation reigns - venture capitalists and angel investors are investing in social startups of all kinds. Or the upper Midwest, where nonprofit banks have eclipsed the $1 billion mark by lending money for community development. Or the Northeast, where national foundations invest loans and equity in social enterprises and the public sector is willing to "pay for success."
Member Highlight: Mark C. Callaway
Author: Southeastern Council of Foundations
If you've attended an Annual Meeting session on impact investing in the last few years, you've probably heard from Mark Callaway - there might be no bigger evangelist for the practice in all of SECF's membership.
Mark, who was elected to the SECF Board of Trustees at this year's Annual Meeting, developed an interest in environmental and social issues while living in Northern California in the 1960s and 70s - that led him to later embrace the Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) movement in the early 2000s.
Mark said impact investing will continue to be a focus in his work as a Board member.
"I feel very strongly about the Impact space and wanted to make sure that I could continue to focus in that area," Mark said. "I think the opportunity to showcase Impact Investing at the 50th Annual Meeting will be an ideal opportunity for us to focus on the work that is being done in the Southeast in this space that doesn't usually get the opportunity to be highlighted."